<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaFX links of the week, July 19</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fxexperience.com/2010/07/javafx-links-of-the-week-july-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fxexperience.com/2010/07/javafx-links-of-the-week-july-19/</link>
	<description>Sharing the Experience of JavaFX</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:43:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbs</title>
		<link>http://fxexperience.com/2010/07/javafx-links-of-the-week-july-19/comment-page-1/#comment-8721</link>
		<dc:creator>jbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fxexperience.com/?p=944#comment-8721</guid>
		<description>I realize that it hasn&#039;t been announced here yet but thank you for getting rid of the wierd rotating sun-ray java plugin animation with 1.3.1.  This new system is so much better.  Also I think I note an improvement in startup withh 1.6.0_u21.  I would characterize it as a 20% improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize that it hasn&#8217;t been announced here yet but thank you for getting rid of the wierd rotating sun-ray java plugin animation with 1.3.1.  This new system is so much better.  Also I think I note an improvement in startup withh 1.6.0_u21.  I would characterize it as a 20% improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://fxexperience.com/2010/07/javafx-links-of-the-week-july-19/comment-page-1/#comment-8540</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fxexperience.com/?p=944#comment-8540</guid>
		<description>I asked about this on Oracle&#039;s Facebook page, and surprisingly received a reply to the effect that the samples at javafx.com were only ever intended to be code examples and not whiz-bang demos per se - but that they understood that good-looking demos were a priority and were working towards it. That was a few weeks ago now, however. 

I also made the comparison between the javafx.com demos, and this:

http://www.chromeexperiments.com/

If it&#039;s showing off RIA, there is simply no comparison at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked about this on Oracle&#8217;s Facebook page, and surprisingly received a reply to the effect that the samples at javafx.com were only ever intended to be code examples and not whiz-bang demos per se &#8211; but that they understood that good-looking demos were a priority and were working towards it. That was a few weeks ago now, however. </p>
<p>I also made the comparison between the javafx.com demos, and this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chromeexperiments.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.chromeexperiments.com/</a></p>
<p>If it&#8217;s showing off RIA, there is simply no comparison at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Allouch</title>
		<link>http://fxexperience.com/2010/07/javafx-links-of-the-week-july-19/comment-page-1/#comment-8378</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Allouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fxexperience.com/?p=944#comment-8378</guid>
		<description>Are you aware that you just made an announcement ? :)
When is this updated plugin out ?

Btw, have you read my comment ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you aware that you just made an announcement ? <img src='http://fxexperience.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
When is this updated plugin out ?</p>
<p>Btw, have you read my comment ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bair</title>
		<link>http://fxexperience.com/2010/07/javafx-links-of-the-week-july-19/comment-page-1/#comment-8373</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fxexperience.com/?p=944#comment-8373</guid>
		<description>I think the solution to the &quot;30 seconds for the home page to load problem&quot; is best fixed by addressing the root cause (slow plugin) rather than by retreating :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the solution to the &#8220;30 seconds for the home page to load problem&#8221; is best fixed by addressing the root cause (slow plugin) rather than by retreating <img src='http://fxexperience.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Allouch</title>
		<link>http://fxexperience.com/2010/07/javafx-links-of-the-week-july-19/comment-page-1/#comment-8368</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Allouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fxexperience.com/?p=944#comment-8368</guid>
		<description>Concerning the &quot;JavaFX is a train wreck&quot; debate, they all know the solution to make it an instant success: give it a Java syntax.
When JavaFX was introduced, Richard Bair kept repeating &quot;you have to separated JavaFX and the JavaFX Script technologies&quot; or &quot;it&#039;s Swing2 we&#039;re building here&quot;.

That would be enough to make me try it in my current Swing projects.
All we want is a cleaner, less inheritance-oriented Swing API, which JavaFX can be.

Come on ! Give it a Java API, add the whole SwingX team to the project and watch it grow !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning the &#8220;JavaFX is a train wreck&#8221; debate, they all know the solution to make it an instant success: give it a Java syntax.<br />
When JavaFX was introduced, Richard Bair kept repeating &#8220;you have to separated JavaFX and the JavaFX Script technologies&#8221; or &#8220;it&#8217;s Swing2 we&#8217;re building here&#8221;.</p>
<p>That would be enough to make me try it in my current Swing projects.<br />
All we want is a cleaner, less inheritance-oriented Swing API, which JavaFX can be.</p>
<p>Come on ! Give it a Java API, add the whole SwingX team to the project and watch it grow !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbs</title>
		<link>http://fxexperience.com/2010/07/javafx-links-of-the-week-july-19/comment-page-1/#comment-8338</link>
		<dc:creator>jbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fxexperience.com/?p=944#comment-8338</guid>
		<description>Kirill is right about one thing:  Oracle should pull at least two thirds of the ugly apps from the JavaFX site.  Those apps are no advertisement for using JavaFX.  They&#039;re an eyesore.  Spend some money.  Hire some real designers to rework the samples section and ban all apps from the JavaFX home page.  If I have to wait 30 seconds for the home page to load, I&#039;m not sticking around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirill is right about one thing:  Oracle should pull at least two thirds of the ugly apps from the JavaFX site.  Those apps are no advertisement for using JavaFX.  They&#8217;re an eyesore.  Spend some money.  Hire some real designers to rework the samples section and ban all apps from the JavaFX home page.  If I have to wait 30 seconds for the home page to load, I&#8217;m not sticking around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

