<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaFX links of the week, April 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fxexperience.com/2010/04/javafx-links-of-the-week-april-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fxexperience.com/2010/04/javafx-links-of-the-week-april-5/</link>
	<description>Sharing the Experience of JavaFX</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 22:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Marks</title>
		<link>http://fxexperience.com/2010/04/javafx-links-of-the-week-april-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5494</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 03:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fxexperience.com/?p=699#comment-5494</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link! I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d go so far as to say that types should be declared for every variable. For functions, yes, but I&#039;m still open on variables. Letting the compiler infer variables&#039; types doesn&#039;t seem as dangerous as it is for function return types.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link! I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d go so far as to say that types should be declared for every variable. For functions, yes, but I&#8217;m still open on variables. Letting the compiler infer variables&#8217; types doesn&#8217;t seem as dangerous as it is for function return types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

